Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael Clayton's avatar

“Nathan Peternel told the congregation Sunday that he has not abandoned his son and continues to pray for him.”

That’s pietistic church talk. He *has* abandoned his son, seeking his own legal representation, even though he hasn’t been charged with a crime, but not doing the same for his son. He could easily pay the $2,500 for his son’s pre-trial release as well. Nathan has made a very prosperous yet dubious living in a calling which should not lead to such wealth. Just check out his additional yellow sports car, just for starters.

I’m not defending or advocating for Jonathan Peternel in the slightest, and believe justice should be served, but Nathan can’t honestly say, with tears in his eyes, that he hasn’t abandoned his son.

Expand full comment
Michael Clayton's avatar

Nathan claims his personal pictures and videos were password protected, and that Jonathan not only hacked his files, but emphasized Jonathan was “high” when he did so. That’s a very dubious detail to add, that Jonathan didn’t simply hack his password protected files, but did so while he was “high.”

How does that work? Typically being “high” would make such an already difficult task even harder, if not impossible. I’m curious about this additional detail. Was it observed to make his son out to be even worse? That Jonathan not only hacked his files, but was high when he did so. Was it to deflect from what Nathan clearly seems to feel guilty about, having made such a collection, by making Jonathan’s deed even worse?

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?